1) With respect to APA formatting,

2) 2.5 pages, double-spaced, 12-pt. font typewritten case analysis (TEXT only not including references).

3) please review peer-reviewed journal articles and books for external source

4)  Use outside sources, to build your argument. Please refer to peer- reviewed sources and professional sources as you can find to back up your analyses and opinions.

5) Use the discussions questions at the end of the case to help frame/guide your analysis.

6) This case requires the knowledge from the International management concepts. For example, the question# 1 is about the framework of cultural factors. Conduct SWOT analysis to evaluate the culture of the host country for sourcing the necessary ingredients. Question #2 is understanding the global management to assess the market. What might be some of the strategies to manage global markets? The concepts you address, and your explanations need to be supported with relevant concept from the text.

 

 

Case Analysis Grading Rubric

 

  Far Exceeds Standards Exceeds Standards Meets Standards Fails to Meet Standards
Identification of Critical Issues and Depth of Analysis

 

Will consider how focused your analysis is, and whether you address many of the existing and critical issues in the case.

 

 

 

 

Score:

Identifies all of the critical managerial issues related with international management. Thoroughly discusses, evaluates, and analyzes each managerial issue, providing convincing and supported arguments.

 

(40)

Identifies most of the critical managerial issues related with international management. Discusses, evaluates, and analyzes each managerial issue, providing convincing and supported arguments, but could have gone into more depth.

(36)

Identifies many of the critical managerial issues related with international management. Discusses, evaluates, and analyzes most of the managerial issues, providing convincing and supported arguments, but could have gone into much more depth.

 

(32)

Identifies few, if any, critical managerial issues related with international management. Fails to discuss, evaluate, and analyze each managerial issue, does not provide supported arguments, and lacks any significant degree of depth.

 

(28 or less)

 

Application of International Management Concepts in the Case.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Score:

Provided a thorough and well-supported application of international management concepts with all of the critical, problematic issues, and recommendations in the case.

 

 

 

(40)

Provided a sufficient and supported application of several international management concepts with most of the critical, problematic issues in the case, but could have gone into more depth or provided a few more

(36)

Applied some international management concepts for dealing with some of the critical, problematic issues in the case, but could have gone into much more depth, provided more application, and/or provided several more

 

 

(32)

Applied few, if any, international management concepts for dealing with some of the critical, problematic issues in the case, and provided little or no support.

 

 

 

 

 

(28 or less)

Supported Recommendations Regarding the Best Approaches for Handling the Problematic Issues related to global business management in the Case.

 

 

 

 

Score:

Provided a thorough and well-supported discussion of several valid approaches for dealing with all of the critical, problematic issues in the case.

 

 

 

 

(20)

Provided a sufficient and supported discussion of several valid approaches for dealing with most of the critical, problematic issues in the case, but could have gone into more depth or provided a few more

(18)

Discussed some valid approaches for dealing with some of the critical, problematic issues in the case, but could have gone into much more depth, provided more support, and/or provided several more

 

 

(18)

Discussed few, if any, approaches for dealing with some of the critical, problematic issues in the case, and provided little or no support.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(14 or less)

Turnitin.com Similarity Rating

 

 

 

 

 

 

Score: (This is a part of the overall grade)

 

Student submits a paper that scores a low similarity rating (below 25%), indicating a high degree of originality of the student’s work.

 

Student submits a paper that scores a mid-range similarity rating (between 25 and 40%).

 

 

 

(10-20 Points will be deducted)

Student submits a paper that scores a rather high similarity rating (between 40% and 75%).

 

 

 

(Paper will not be graded)

 

Student submits a paper that scores a high similarity rating (above 75%), suggesting that there could be an issue with plagiarism.

 

(Will be reported to Department Chair of Management)

 

Overall Quality of Written Communication

 

 

 

 

 

Score: (This is a part of the overall grade)

 

Student presented a well-written, coherent analysis that was free from any grammar and/or spelling errors.

 

Student presented a well-written, coherent analysis that contained a few minor errors.

 

 

 

(-5)

Student presented a rather coherent analysis that contained several minor errors.

 

 

 

(-10)

Student presented an incoherent analysis that contained several major errors.

 

 

(Revise and Re-submit with a grade reduction)

 

Total Score:

 

 

____ out of 50