Note: This assignment description is also explained within the attachment as well as the rubric.
In 750-1,000 words, consider the case of Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California to answer the following:
1. Discuss why the case is important to mental health clinicians.
2. Describe the violence risk assessment instruments a clinician might use to meet the requirements provided for in Tarasoff.
3. Discuss if a clinician should be held civilly liable for violent behavior of an inmate the clinician assessed.
Provide three to five peer reviewed resources to support your explanations.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.