Objective of the assignment: The objective of this assignment is to allow you to demonstrate your knowledge of the steps required to recruit and staff for an important segment of the workplace and to demonstrate your strategic skills to the CEO. You will share some of the essential strategic and administrative steps for this important function of Human Resources and will include metrics for which to evaluate the recruitment and selection approach that will be implemented.              

 Objective of the assignment: The objective of this assignment is to allow you to demonstrate your knowledge of the steps required to recruit and staff for an important segment of the workplace and to demonstrate your strategic skills to the CEO. You will share some of the essential strategic and administrative steps for this important function of Human Resources and will include metrics for which to evaluate the recruitment and selection approach that will be implemented.

The situation: Suppose that you are the new HR Director at HSS (the case study presented in our Course Resources under modules) and you have already made a presentation to the CEO and the Board of Directors on the need for HR planning and enhanced strategic role that HR must play in the organization. After that presentation, and having read the research on managing human resources strategically that you have presented (assignment 2 literature review), the CEO confides that she has been thinking about how the senior staff in the organization are recruited and selected. As a result, she has asked you to propose new recruitment and selection methods for the senior level employees.

Connect with a professional writer in 5 simple steps

Please provide as many details about your writing struggle as possible

Academic level of your paper

Type of Paper

When is it due?

How many pages is this assigment?

 

Deliverable:

The CEO’s directive to you is to prepare a short (approximately five-page double spaced) proposal that includes at the least:

 

1.  A cover memo to the CEO providing an overview of the task assigned and a summary of your proposal

2.  A description of at least three recruitment approaches that could be considered

3.  A description of at least three selection approaches that could be considered

4.  A cost/benefit analysis and comparison of the approaches of both the recruitment and selection approached

5.  Metrics the organization could use to evaluate the effectiveness of the on-going recruitment and selection of senior level employees. Propose at least three metrics for the evaluation (include the time frame for your evaluation period such as six months after entry into the position).

6.  Your recommended approach and your arguments/justification to defend your choices.

7.  A conclusion section that includes a summary of the approaches recommended, the benefits and any other aspects to the proposal you want to highlight.

Notes: Use topic headings to organization your presentation, include in-text citations for statements of fact, and provide a reference page if in text citations are used in the proposal, use professional level language and writing. Most importantly only use scholarly sources. NO ABSTRACTS.

 

 

Rubric Name: Assignment 3 Rubric

 

Criteria Exceeds Expectations
12 points
Meets Expectations
11 points
Meets Some Expectations
10 points
Does Not Meet Expectations
8 points
Not Included
0 points
Criterion 1 The paper presented innovative and professionally relevant recommendations. Included was an exceptional description of the approaches available, thoroughanalysis of the costs and benefits associated with each approach; and metrics used to assess thechoices and make your decision. Theproposal closes with aconvincing discussionand justification of the recommended approach in defense of the choices. The paper presented professionally relevant recommendations. Included was an acceptable description of the approaches available, thorough analysis of the costs and benefits associated with each approach; and metrics used to assess the choices and make your decision. The proposal closes with a convincing discussion and justification of the recommended approach in defense of the choices. The paper presented adequate recommendations. Included was some but not of the following: an acceptable description of the approaches available, thorough analysis of the costs and benefits associated with each approach; and metrics used to assess the choices and make your decision. The proposal closes with a discussion and justification of the recommended approach in defense of the choices The paper presented recommendations but they were not relevant or appropriate. Included was some but not of the following: an acceptable description of the approaches available, thorough analysis of the costs and benefits associated with each approach; and metrics used to assess the choices and make your decision. The proposal closes with a discussion and justification of the recommended approach in defense of the choices. Not Included
Criteria Exceeds Expectations
6 points
Meets Expectations
5 points
Meets Some Expectations
4 points
Does Not Meet Expectations
3 points
Not Included
0 points
Criterion 1 Paper exceeds the stated requirements for page numbers, in text citations in APA format. Paper is at least one and a half pages. There are at least three citations, and they are APA compliant. Paper meets the number of pages requirement but not the requirement of APA compliant citations. Paper does not meet the expectations of the page numbers or the in text citations. Not Included
Overall Score Level 5
18 or more
Level 4
16 or more
Level 3
14 or more
Level 2
11 or more
Level 1
0 or more