HUM-200-J3418 Applied Humanities 19EW3Subscription alerts – You have new alertsUpdate alerts – You have new alertsSenita Reynolds

Breadcrumb:

  1. Assignments 
  2. 4-2 Project Part One: Rough Draft

4-2 Project Part One: Rough Draft

Show Assignment InformationHide Rubrics

Rubric Name: HUM 200 Project Part One Rough Draft Rubric

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.CriteriaProficientNeeds ImprovementNot EvidentCultural Artifacts8 pointsDescribes selected cultural artifacts5.6 pointsDescribes selected cultural artifacts but with gaps in detail or clarity0 pointsDoes not describe selected cultural artifacts/ 8Common Theme8 pointsIdentifies at least one common theme to serve as framework of exploration document and explains how theme is expressed in artifacts5.6 pointsIdentifies at least one common theme to serve as framework of exploration document and explains how theme is expressed in artifacts but with gaps in clarity or detail0 pointsDoes not identify at least one common theme to serve as framework of exploration document and does not explain how theme is expressed in artifacts/ 8Personal Experience8 pointsExplains how identified theme is related to personal experience5.6 pointsExplains how identified theme is related to personal experience but with gaps in clarity or detail0 pointsDoes not explain how identified theme is related to personal experience/ 8Profession8 pointsDiscusses a profession that could be impacted by identified theme5.6 pointsDiscusses a profession that could be impacted by identified theme but with gaps in clarity or detail0 pointsDoes not discuss a profession that could be impacted by identified theme/ 8Humanities Resources8 pointsDescribes at least three relevant and appropriate humanities resources that could be used to investigate theme and artifacts5.6 pointsDescribes at least three humanities resources that could be used to investigate theme and artifacts but with gaps in appropriateness, relevance, or detail0 pointsDoes not describe at least three humanities resources that could be used to investigate theme and artifacts/ 8Research: Historical Context8 pointsDiscusses relationship between each cultural artifact and its historical context, citing sources5.6 pointsDiscusses relationship between each cultural artifact and its historical context but with gaps in detail, clarity, or citation0 pointsDoes not discuss relationship between each cultural artifact and its historical context/ 8Research: Similarities and Differences8 pointsExplains similarities and differences observed in cultural artifacts in relation to theme, citing sources5.6 pointsExplains similarities and differences observed in cultural artifacts but not in relation to theme or with gaps in detail, clarity, or citation0 pointsDoes not explain similarities and differences observed in cultural artifacts/ 8Research: Medium8 pointsDiscusses the medium through which cultural artifacts were created, citing sources5.6 pointsDiscusses the medium through which cultural artifacts were created but with gaps in detail, clarity, or citation0 pointsDoes not discuss the medium through which cultural artifacts were created/ 8Thesis Statement8 pointsDevelops clear, specific, and arguable thesis statement that conveys claim about theme and artifacts, based on research5.6 pointsDevelops thesis statement that conveys claim about theme and artifacts but thesis statement is not based on research, lacks clarity or specificity, or is not arguable0 pointsDoes not develop thesis statement that conveys claim about theme and artifacts/ 8Audience8 pointsIdentifies an audience that would be interested in theme and thesis statement, based on research5.6 pointsIdentifies an audience but audience is not appropriate for theme and thesis statement or is not based on research0 pointsDoes not identify an audience/ 8Message8 pointsDescribes how and why message can be tailored to audience, providing specific examples based on research5.6 pointsDescribes how and why message can be tailored to audience but with gaps in examples or research support0 pointsDoes not describe how and why message can be tailored to audience/ 8Reference List8 pointsProvides reference list that includes all humanities resources used to research artifacts, theme, and thesis statement, ensuring that list is formatted according to current APA guidelines5.6 pointsProvides reference list that includes all humanities resources used to research artifacts, theme, and thesis statement, but list has gaps in adherence to current APA formatting guidelines0 pointsDoes not provide reference list that includes all humanities resources used to research artifacts, theme, and thesis statement/ 8Articulation of Response4 pointsSubmission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization2.8 pointsSubmission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas0 pointsSubmission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas